My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM | 
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM | 16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM | 5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM | 41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM | 44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM | 7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM | 10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM | 35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM | 10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM | 39 comments
Comments (3)
I am surprised that anyone ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by sam | January 29, 2008 11:00 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I am surprised that anyone still looks at Rasmussen (at least for the state primaries). How far off th MOE has he been, in every matchup this election season? He does not have a clue what he is polling.
1. Posted by sam | January 29, 2008 11:00 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on January 29, 2008 23:00
2. Posted by Steve Crickmore | January 30, 2008 8:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
As I understand it, you must stop conducting polls 36 hours before the official primary polls open (or at least that was the explanation in NH.) That leaves alot of room for independent voters, and undecided voters, last minute swing changes etc. Rasmussen was spot on in Iowa and Nevada, understimated Hillary in New Hampshire, and underestimated Obama in South Carolina.
2. Posted by Steve Crickmore | January 30, 2008 8:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 30, 2008 08:13
3. Posted by Lee Ward | January 30, 2008 8:54 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I haven't looked at Connecticut, and it may well go to Obama, but you certainly can't base that call on a Rasmussen poll - from my experience that are highly unreliable, and among the worst of the polls out there.
3. Posted by Lee Ward | January 30, 2008 8:54 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 30, 2008 08:54