« Obama is the "Strong Winner" in South Carolina | Main | Legislator by day, comedian by night »

Obama's Advantage With Blacks and Super Tuesday

Update:

Commenter Sam points out that Edwards will poll lower in Tennessee than his native South Carolina. So, when I recalculate capping Edwards at 15% and splitting the remaining white vote 2-to-1 for Clinton I come up with this:

Obama: 45%
Clinton: 39%
Edwards: 15%

Closer, but the math still looks difficult for Clinton if Obama can maintain his huge 4-to-1 advantage with black voters. As I said, Obama is likely to do better among Tennessee's whites than in the more racially polarized South Carolina. Also, interesting to note is that Harold Ford Jr. pulled 48% among all Tennesseeans in 2006.


(Original post here)


Super Tuesday is coming and Barack Obama's ability to capture the lion's share of black voters could tilt several states into his column. South Carolina is 29% black and they made up 55% of the voters in the primary there. Here is the percentage of the black population in some key Super Tuesday states:

Alabama: 29.2%
Arkansas: 15.5%
Delaware: 20%
Georgia: 27.5%
Illinois: 15%
Missouri: 11%
New Jersey: 15.3%
New York: 15.7%
Tennessee: 16.1%

Now consider some of the South Carolina exit polling data:

Black voters dominated the South Carolina primary and voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama, with 78 percent supporting him. Nineteen percent of blacks voted for Hillary Rodham Clinton. While a quarter of whites voted for Obama, three-quarters of whites split their votes between the two white candidates, Clinton and John Edwards, voting 40 percent for Edwards and 36 percent for Clinton. Edwards' support came almost entirely from white voters.

If these patterns are repeated on Super Tuesday then Obama should cruise to victory in Georgia and Alabama by a wide margin. States like Tennessee get more interesting. Assuming that blacks make up 30% of the turnout and that we see the same breakdown along racial lines as in South Carolina the result would be:

Obama: 40%
Clinton: 30%
Edwards: 29%

In actuality, Obama is likely to do better than the 25% share of white votes he received in South Carolina because Tennessee is not polarized as much. Obama has proven in Iowa and in New Hampshire (where he came in second by just 2%) the he can pull white votes.

In addition to Georgia, Alabama and Tennessee Obama should handily win his home state of Illinois. Clinton's advantage in New York, New Jersey, and Arkansas is probably unassailable. Missouri, Oklahoma and, most importantly, California could be real dog fights. Obama doesn't need to win all the battleground races however, he just needs to scoop up a fair share of the delegates that are up for grabs.

The bottom line is that Super Tuesday won't be the end of this campaign on the Democratic side. Obama should have several wins that day to keep his campaign going. Keep your eyes on the big prize: California.


  • Currently 2.3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 2.3/5 (3 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

Comments (5)

One glaring problem with yo... (Below threshold)
sam:

One glaring problem with your analysis is the level of support for Edwards in other states. Remember that Edwards is a native son of South Carolina, and will not maintain the same level of support in other states, even Southern ones.

Well, Edwards had 18% in So... (Below threshold)

Well, Edwards had 18% in South Carolina, 17% in New Hampshire, and 30% in Iowa. But I think you're right, he'll probably get less than 29% in Tennessee.

Larkin, I'm very happy that... (Below threshold)

Larkin, I'm very happy that you're still posting on some part of the Wizbang network. You're a very talented writer, and I'll be sure to read your posts here each day. Thanks for all your comments, help and encouragement you offered me in the past as well. The 2008 elections are just too interesting not to comment on them. Thanks again for everything.

Thanks for the kind words P... (Below threshold)

Thanks for the kind words Paul. Be sure to check out this if you're interested is more incendiary stuff. We try to keep it civil here in Politics.

As analysts try to be soooo... (Below threshold)

As analysts try to be soooooo fair to Obama or the Hildabeast for the politically correct reasons, one is tempted to ask for the media of all stripes to just point out that both of these people are just socialist pacifists. They are just old line libs with the same tax, military, populist, cultural naivete, national security weaknesses that all Dems have. As we look for Camelot in both parties, I wonder when it will be finalized that NOT TO VOTE FOR A FEMALE AND OR A BLACK WILL BE THE HEIGHT OF POLITICAL FASCISM? Both of these candidates are horrors for free enterprise, American security and tax cutting. It is time for the conservTalk Radio and blog contingent to blast both of these people. Simply killing the Clintons is not enough . Obama would be a horror too.




Advertisements






rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Categories

Monthly Archives

Wizbang Politics Blogroll

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

DCMA Compliance Notice

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Site Meter