My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM |
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM |
16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM |
5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM |
41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM |
44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM |
7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM |
10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM |
35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM |
10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM |
39 comments
Comments (12)
Jessica's Chocolate Illy Pi... (Below threshold)1. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 5:36 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jessica's Chocolate Illy Pies, makes 18
1/2 cup flour
1/4 cup unsweetened cocoa powder
4 teaspoons instant espresso
1 teaspoon baking powder
1/8 teaspoon salt
4 tablespoons unsalted butter
2/3 cup light brown sugar
1 egg
1 tablespoon milk
4 ounces bittersweet or semisweet chocolate, melted and cooled
Confectioners sugar for coating
Sift flour, cocoa powder, espresso, baking powder and salt together.
Cream butter and brown sugar, add egg and chocolate and finally dry mix.
Beat in milk until just combined.
Flatten and wrap in plastic wrap and freeze until firm, 20-40 minutes.
Oven 350 degrees.
Shape dough into 1 inch balls and roll twice in powdered sugar.
Bake for 12-14 minutes.
Cool on wire rack.
Martha calls 'em 'Chocolate Espresso Snowcaps.
She would.
============
1. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 5:36 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 05:36
2. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 7:42 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Who can best point out that Graeme Frost's parents are caricatures of the worst of progressive thinking. Self-employed with little taxable income, they are rich tax cheats. And public schools aren't good enough for their children, but public health is? Don't these people ever examine themselves?
===============================
2. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 7:42 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 07:42
3. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 9:10 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Which brings up a marvelous solution to the crisis in public education. Public health standards are driven by the private sector, public education standards should be driven by the private sector. Let's see what the mechanism would be.
Omigod, something like vouchers! And I like charter schools.
================================
3. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 9:10 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 09:10
4. Posted by P. Bunyan | October 8, 2007 9:53 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Seems to me Allen's article further reinforces what I've said about the Republicans all along: They may not be that great, but they are by far the lesser of two evils.
Oh how I would just once love to vote for someone, rather than voting against their opponent.
(Now Huckabee, I think I could vote "for", but as usual he won't win the nomination.)
4. Posted by P. Bunyan | October 8, 2007 9:53 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 09:53
5. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 9:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
They should run as troika.
=================
5. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 9:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 09:56
6. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 9:58 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And I may have a theme. The Progressive life is not worth living, because it isn't examined.
=========================================
6. Posted by kim | October 8, 2007 9:58 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 09:58
7. Posted by Oyster | October 8, 2007 9:58 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Conversely, what would the Democrats have done for the last few years without Bush? They'll be running against him for years to come.
7. Posted by Oyster | October 8, 2007 9:58 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 09:58
8. Posted by Glenn Koons | October 8, 2007 1:56 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Unfortunately, Ronaldus Magnus is dead. He was the last one I loved and proudly voted for. Still, we do not live in the City of God nor are we electing a priest, Pope or Apostle. We are voting for a guy hopefully who will keep socialism, pacifism and international defeat from our doors. Someone who will select SCOTUS jurists, cut taxes and hopefully defeat the Islamos. He will not be perfect but he will be one who is better than Her Highness and the other socialists. And all this malarky about slow vs fast socialism is just that , blather. Neither Rudy, Fred or Mitt will bring socialism or pacifism to our nation. Any Dem would.
8. Posted by Glenn Koons | October 8, 2007 1:56 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 13:56
9. Posted by bryanD | October 8, 2007 9:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"And all this malarky about slow vs fast socialism is just that , blather."-gk
1848 Marxist Revolution suppressed.
New tack pondered upon lessons learned:
Result: slow vs MODERATELY fast socialist programs, both based upon coalition (compromise solution):
ergo,circa 1882(?) (1)successful Fabian Society (slow), birthed modern economic theory (Keynesianism) that ran the world until Vietnam bankrupted sponsor (USA). Produced Winston Churchill, notable for his "conservative" template against which other big government "conservatives" today are allowed leeway (to borrow $$ for the Cause). The Ends justify the Means.
The fast program (2) Socialist (later Communist) International, circa 1889(?).
We all know the program here, being non-taboo since the European Social Democratic break with Soviet Communism in reaction to Stalin's anti-semitic programs (and alternate source of easy USA credit) in the mid 1950s. Essentially, a direct action movement which was found to be wanting of a secondary position. Now known for Strikes, being decidely in decline in the west.
Both US political party philosophies have been based on one or the other of these socialist (big government) concepts since 1936. Even Reagan's "trickle down" was based on deficit spending (see Churchill). Laffer's Curve was supposed to show (on a chart!) a future that never could have come. Whatever happened to Laffer, anyway?
9. Posted by bryanD | October 8, 2007 9:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 21:13
10. Posted by bryanD | October 8, 2007 9:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Glenn, don't forget the 2nd and 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto!
10. Posted by bryanD | October 8, 2007 9:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 21:14
11. Posted by bryanD | October 8, 2007 9:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
PS: I voted Reagan, too. He was needed in 1980. Unfortunately, his admin was run by G Shultz after 1984 (with H Baker after 1986). Very sad, alzheimers disease.
11. Posted by bryanD | October 8, 2007 9:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 8, 2007 21:20
12. Posted by kim | October 9, 2007 5:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
bD, the libertarian maven of socialism.
======================================
12. Posted by kim | October 9, 2007 5:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2007 05:02