My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM |
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM |
16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM |
5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM |
41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM |
44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM |
7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM |
10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM |
35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM |
10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM |
39 comments
Comments (4)
Represenative Ron Paul is m... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Matt | May 22, 2007 6:23 PM | Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
Represenative Ron Paul is marginalized by the party, mainstream media and portions of the blogosphere because he is the only true conservative republican running for president. He supports the constitution and believes that laws should be constitutional BEFORE they are passed. He supports minimal taxes, which has to pass constitutional muster. He supports Congress legally delcaring war, in accordance with the constitution, not passing the buck to the president etc. Representative Paul has voted agains all congressional pay raises, against tax increases, against illegal alien amnesty etc. Representative Paul does not live off the largess of lobbyists, and does not take vacations on the taxpayers dime. Representative Paul actually representst the PEOPLE of his district, not the Republican party, not Corporate america, not special interest groups.
The Bush administration is getting bashed by everybody about the war, huge percentages of americans are against it. Bushes own party is no longer happy about the war. Funny, that when Ron Paul speaks up against it though, he is marginalized.
1. Posted by Matt | May 22, 2007 6:23 PM |
Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
Posted on May 22, 2007 18:23
2. Posted by Pam | May 22, 2007 8:21 PM | Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
Excellent Post! Ron Paul is not a "true" conservative; he is an isolationist. There is a huge difference. Sept 11th proved that the oceans no longer protect us. We are a free nation, and unless we are prepared to go lock down, then we must stay on the offensive.
Moreover, our economic security demands we fix what is/was broken. We can not pull out of Iraq because to do so means we leave behind the world's second largest oil field. We leave it to Iran or Syria. Not to mention the civil war which could engulf the whole region, threating to raise oil prices.
We can't get out of the Middle East because our economy is tied to oil and the oil is there. Believe me if we were drilling here and building new refineries, I'd be happy to talk about it, but as long as the Dems are blocking new production and refining capibilites, then leaveing the irrational Muslims to their destructive civil wars is nothing more than a pipe dream.
2. Posted by Pam | May 22, 2007 8:21 PM |
Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on May 22, 2007 20:21
3. Posted by DickieFlatts | May 23, 2007 3:54 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
That David Hasslehoff song is ringing in head, "I lookin' for freeeeedom!"
http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=/watch%3Feurl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdigbysblog.blogspot.com%252F2007%252F05%252Fliberation-by-digby-video-is-shaky-but.html%26v%3D77-6OMB50Vo
Bush has freed the people of Iraq. Freed them to exercise their religeous beliefs.
3. Posted by DickieFlatts | May 23, 2007 3:54 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on May 23, 2007 15:54
4. Posted by Jim Addison | May 24, 2007 2:57 AM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Paul is "marginalized" by his views, which are clearly over the margins. He doesn't give a rip for the Constitution. The Constitution grants great leeway on the pursuit of our foreign policy; Paul would place extreme limits upon it, ones never contemplated by the Founders. Washington's admonition against "entangling alliances" was directed against treaties which would draw us into someone else's war by default (granted, one could consider NATO and SEATO such alliances), NOT against acting in our own self interests.
This isn't someone else's war or some treaty organization's war. It's OUR war.
If Paul's insane policies had been America's from the end of WWII, we would be living in Soviet America today, and the world would be communist - because Libertarians wouldn't lift a finger until they were coming up the Mississippi in rowboats.
It's hard to "marginalize" a moron like that. I'll give Ron Paul this much: by serving in Congress, he is saving lives. How many people would he be treating as a physician if he weren't stroking his ego in DC? They don't know how lucky they are . . .
4. Posted by Jim Addison | May 24, 2007 2:57 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 24, 2007 02:57