« 2010 Kansas Senate Race | Main | It's official: Hillary's in!! »
Betsy Newmark blogs about a libertarian-leaning Republican who does not have much of a chance to win, but might be able to impact the 2008 race if he is part of the debates.
Permalink | Send To A Friend | Linking Blogs | Digg this!
Filed under:
2008 Presidential Race
Send e-mail tips to us:
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM | 
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM | 16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM | 5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM | 41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM | 44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM | 7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM | 10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM | 35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM | 10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM | 39 comments
* denotes a recently updated blog
Publisher: Kevin Aylward
Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty
All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type 3.35
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (3)
Lorie, couldn't you type "R... (Below threshold)1. Posted by bryanD | January 20, 2007 3:32 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Lorie, couldn't you type "Ron Paul" instead of "libertarian-leaning Republican"? I guessed correctly who the subject would be, but I don't like putting out for neocon bloggers. Muravchuk and Delay on the homepage. Both scum. One country club, one SDS! Ron Paul KICKS ASS, though! PAUL-TANCREDO'08
1. Posted by bryanD | January 20, 2007 3:32 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 03:32
2. Posted by Mark Roth | January 20, 2007 10:18 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hillary's launched.
Officially.
2. Posted by Mark Roth | January 20, 2007 10:18 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 10:18
3. Posted by Jim Addison | January 21, 2007 1:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ron Paul ran for President as the Libertine Party candidate in 1988, and received less than 450,000 votes out of over 90 million cast. Any "impact" his candidacy might have is mainly in the imagination of the fringe LP types.
Republicans have typically been quicker than Democrats to "weed the field" for their primary debates. Paul might be invited to the first couple fora this year, but would likely not be included in later events without some sign of support in the polls, which he won't get.
Libertarians can only aspire to beat the "margin of error" in the polls.
3. Posted by Jim Addison | January 21, 2007 1:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 21, 2007 01:56