My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM |
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM |
16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM |
5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM |
41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM |
44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM |
7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM |
10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM |
35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM |
10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM |
39 comments
Comments (6)
Why DeWine has not defined ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Steve_in_Corona | September 20, 2006 10:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why DeWine has not defined Brown already as a far left liberal is beyond me.
-----------------------------------
Because DeWine stupidly decided to act like a liberal himself and join Democrats in opposition to Bush on key votes this last election cycle.
Here is a guy who was reliabily conservative who thought the key to reelection was to have a voting record akin to Olympia Snowe going into the election.
My only question (if he loses) is if he will be smart enough to realize this is his own fault, or if he will blame Bush for his defeat.
1. Posted by Steve_in_Corona | September 20, 2006 10:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 20, 2006 10:19
2. Posted by Mark | September 20, 2006 12:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
DeWine's favorabilty and Indie support is very encouraging.
2. Posted by Mark | September 20, 2006 12:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 20, 2006 12:26
3. Posted by Vero | September 20, 2006 12:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I had swore months ago that I would not vote for DeWine this time. That was then, this is now. Not only am I going to vote for him, wife and I are going to work the phone banks, something we have never done before.
DeWine aint 100% conservative, but neither is he 100% Liberal like Brown
3. Posted by Vero | September 20, 2006 12:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 20, 2006 12:36
4. Posted by GOPWins | September 20, 2006 1:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If I thought we could make the seat up somewhere else, I wouldn't give a rat's a** whether or not he lost. Same with Chafee. But since that's probably not going to happen, I guess I'd rather have a liberal R than a whacked out D.
4. Posted by GOPWins | September 20, 2006 1:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 20, 2006 13:46
5. Posted by Steve_in_Corona | September 20, 2006 1:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
In 2004 DeWine had the same ACU rating (68) as Susan Collins of Maine - a lady who has a lifetime rating of 55 (compared to DeWines previous low 80s)
He followed this up with a lower 56 rating in 2005!
That said, if you live in Ohio, obviously you HAVE to vote for the guy. The GOP does not gain by losing this seat, or sending a message here.
But IF he loses, he has nobody but himself to blame.
However, I think I did answer in my first post why it is he is not campaigning by complaining about the liberalism of his opponent.
5. Posted by Steve_in_Corona | September 20, 2006 1:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 20, 2006 13:51
6. Posted by Mark | September 30, 2006 8:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I certainly think that Mike is the right guy for the job. When we vote in a Senator do we really want someone who will rubber stamp every issue along party lines? Of course not. If that were the case we should follow some European political models and just vote for parties and forget the individual candidates completely. Ohio wants someone who is consistent within himself and will stand up for his beliefs as to what is best for Ohio and America even if it means standing against the standard GOP line from time to time. I think that Mike is solid conservative and a good Republican but will stand up for what he believes is best, independant of his party, if need be. That is the kind of Senator everyone should want.
6. Posted by Mark | September 30, 2006 8:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2006 20:21