Swannblog has a must-read column on the polls that have been recently released on the Gubernatorial race and what they mean for the final few months of this campaign.
« Democrats' money woes | Main | 2006 Rhode Island Senate Race »
Swannblog has a must-read column on the polls that have been recently released on the Gubernatorial race and what they mean for the final few months of this campaign.
Send e-mail tips to us:
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM |
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM |
16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM |
5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM |
41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM |
44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM |
7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM |
10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM |
35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM |
10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM |
39 comments
* denotes a recently updated blog
Publisher: Kevin Aylward
Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty
All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type 3.35
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (1)
Since Walczak works for the... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Jim Addison | August 31, 2006 12:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Since Walczak works for the Swann campaign, his views must be seen in that light.
However, he makes a persuasive case that Rendell's support is soft, and that the two polls he analyzed must have used very soft screening for "likely voters," since we haven't seen 75% turnout in a midterm election since such statistics have been kept. In 1964, 69.3% of eligible voters cast ballots - we've experienced nothing close to that since.
I suspect the results are the product of both polls pushing undecideds for answers, and including those answers in the totals.
Swann is undoubtably substantially behind, and for him to come back and win would be a huge upset. But the point about Rendell's support, after four years in office, is well made.
If Swann can get things a bit closer, he could benefit from the momentum Santorum is creating, and Swann's energy could help Santorum, too, as the base becomes more energized and therefore even more likely to turn out.
The effects on the marginal voters on both sides is what is most important. Democrats have been led to believe that both these statewide contests were "in the bag." This makes their marginal voters less likely to bother to turn out. A sense of competitiveness on the Republican ticket can help motivate the base, which has been discouraged for several reasons: Bush's poor polling, perceived lack of progress in Iraq, the immigration and earmarks debates, and the statewide candidates' presumed poor prospects.
1. Posted by Jim Addison | August 31, 2006 12:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 31, 2006 00:25