« Pennsylvania Greens withdraw | Main | Montana Senate: Cheney to raise money for Burns »

Context In Elections

One thing about the election season; there's always a lot of people willing to predict this or that, even half a year before the election. The thing is, they forget events that change the outcome, sometimes just the margin, but sometimes everything changes.

It's too soon to know the impact that the aborted Air Bomb plot will have on the midterm elections, but it seems clear to me that there will be an effect. A candidate could goof by trying to make political gain on a crisis; people do not much like a politician pretending to be a security blanket. But a politician would be very foolish to try to pretend that there is not a real National Security issue raised by the continuing war on Terror. The plotters in England sent a clear rebuttal to the sneering condescension from Leftists who try to wish America back to sleep about the threat. Considering the difficulties caused by the new restrictions on carry-on luggage - think about a 2-hour wait and you can't have a drink, cosmetics, or any number of other 'comfort' items to pass the time - and compare them to the broad acceptance of these conditions as necessary, and you will see that the unconscious behavior of Americans shows they understand the issue at a gut level, and they are on the President's side in general. That does not mean that Republican 'X' will get any more support in his race just because of that, but if his Democrat opponent tries the now-familiar 'terrorists are not an issue' claim again, it will make a difference.

Every election in the same season is affected by national and international events, but it should also be remembered that every individual election has its own character. The 'generic ballot' is laughably stupid; people vote for specific people, not the least because neither the Republicans nor the Democrats enjoy the deep or broad confidence in their party to drive most people to vote just because of the party. Speaking a bit harshly about the modern media, I think that many of the fancy-hair media are just not willing to do the kind of digging and real investigation it would take to even figure out which races are really the competitive ones. Every election season has a few surprises, not least because the news crews spend more time and attention on makeup and lighting than in finding out what's really on the public mind.

  • Currently 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

Comments (2)

Was there ANYONE who though... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

Was there ANYONE who thought, in the days following 9/11/01, that we could avoid another terrorist attack on the Homeland for six months, let alone five years?

{Anyone who did, and posted it with a verifiable date stamp, should link to it, please}.

A lot of people have been doing a lot of things right for a long time. Where's the credit?

I think it was former DHS Secretary Tom Ridge who first pointed out: "We have to be right every single time. The terrorists only have to be right once."

There is no more important issue in this day and time than national security and the war against Islamic fascism, and deep down inside, most people understand that.

We don't have to scare the voters, though. Just the thought of Democrats in charge of security ought to scare them enough.

Also, Eleanor Clift is writ... (Below threshold)
eddiebear:

Also, Eleanor Clift is writing her latest screed that the arrests may actually backfire for the GOP. All I recall is Clift has made a cottage industry claiming every little thing (I know! A plot to blow up airplanes is not "little", but stick with me here) that comes around will shift the ground, usually for the Dems. Besides the terror plot, she has claimed this year alone that Haditha will convince enough independents to flip to the Blue Staters. I also recall her weekly claims in 2004 that the littlest gaseous explosions on the campaign trail would flip enough suburbanites in Cincinnati or retirees in Nevada to the Democrats. I also recall the most hilarious of them all-the flu shot frenzy. Wasn't that supposed to flip FL/OH/NV/AZ?

What I'm getting at is to take a deep breath when the "smart set" starts claiming the latest thing will hurt the GOP.




Advertisements






rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Categories

Monthly Archives

Wizbang Politics Blogroll

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

DCMA Compliance Notice

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Site Meter