My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM |
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM |
16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM |
5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM |
41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM |
44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM |
7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM |
10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM |
35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM |
10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM |
39 comments
Comments (2)
John's analysis seems prett... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Jim Addison | August 8, 2006 5:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
John's analysis seems pretty solid, except where he hypothesizes that "Lamonts funding could dry up" in a general election campaign against an independent Lieberman.
First of all, the Nutroots don't base their support on practical chances of winning, which is why Kos is 1 for 20 in picking candidates. If you swallow the Kool-Aid®, they will follow you all the way to Jonestown.
Secondly, Lamont is worth over $200 million, so I doubt he will run out of campaign money anytime soon.
1. Posted by Jim Addison | August 8, 2006 5:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 8, 2006 17:13
2. Posted by Robert | August 9, 2006 5:55 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
60% of Americans = Extremists
2. Posted by Robert | August 9, 2006 5:55 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 9, 2006 17:55